↓ Skip to main content

Germline variation at 8q24 and prostate cancer risk in men of European ancestry

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Germline variation at 8q24 and prostate cancer risk in men of European ancestry
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-06863-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Matejcic, Edward J. Saunders, Tokhir Dadaev, Mark N. Brook, Kan Wang, Xin Sheng, Ali Amin Al Olama, Fredrick R. Schumacher, Sue A. Ingles, Koveela Govindasami, Sara Benlloch, Sonja I. Berndt, Demetrius Albanes, Stella Koutros, Kenneth Muir, Victoria L. Stevens, Susan M. Gapstur, Catherine M. Tangen, Jyotsna Batra, Judith Clements, Henrik Gronberg, Nora Pashayan, Johanna Schleutker, Alicja Wolk, Catharine West, Lorelei Mucci, Peter Kraft, Géraldine Cancel-Tassin, Karina D. Sorensen, Lovise Maehle, Eli M. Grindedal, Sara S. Strom, David E. Neal, Freddie C. Hamdy, Jenny L. Donovan, Ruth C. Travis, Robert J. Hamilton, Barry Rosenstein, Yong-Jie Lu, Graham G. Giles, Adam S. Kibel, Ana Vega, Jeanette T. Bensen, Manolis Kogevinas, Kathryn L. Penney, Jong Y. Park, Janet L. Stanford, Cezary Cybulski, Børge G. Nordestgaard, Hermann Brenner, Christiane Maier, Jeri Kim, Manuel R. Teixeira, Susan L. Neuhausen, Kim De Ruyck, Azad Razack, Lisa F. Newcomb, Davor Lessel, Radka Kaneva, Nawaid Usmani, Frank Claessens, Paul A. Townsend, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Monique J. Roobol, Florence Menegaux, Kay-Tee Khaw, Lisa A. Cannon-Albright, Hardev Pandha, Stephen N. Thibodeau, Daniel J. Schaid, Fredrik Wiklund, Stephen J. Chanock, Douglas F. Easton, Rosalind A. Eeles, Zsofia Kote-Jarai, David V. Conti, Christopher A. Haiman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 6 8%
Other 4 5%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 31 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 38 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,782,311
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#31,113
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,530
of 368,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#840
of 1,480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.