| Title |
Vertical and horizontal correlation attacks on RNS-based exponentiations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cryptographic Engineering, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13389-015-0095-0 |
| Authors |
Guilherme Perin, Laurent Imbert, Philippe Maurine, Lionel Torres |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 10 | 63% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
| Design | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#4,182,761
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#8
of 62 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,399
of 264,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cryptographic Engineering
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them