↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of author names in bibliographic data sources: an Italian case study

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy of author names in bibliographic data sources: an Italian case study
Published in
Scientometrics, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11192-018-2945-x
Authors

Camil Demetrescu, Andrea Ribichini, Marco Schaerf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 47%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 5 29%
Social Sciences 3 18%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 12%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#14,365,781
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,863
of 2,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,502
of 350,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#26
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.