↓ Skip to main content

Laboratory Safety and Nanotechnology Workers: an Analysis of Current Guidelines in the USA

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Laboratory Safety and Nanotechnology Workers: an Analysis of Current Guidelines in the USA
Published in
NanoEthics, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11569-016-0250-9
Authors

Jeong Joo Ahn, Youngjae Kim, Elizabeth A. Corley, Dietram A. Scheufele

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 30 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Professor 6 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 22%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 13%
Environmental Science 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,964,379
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#129
of 232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,003
of 397,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 232 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.