↓ Skip to main content

Drivers of the Distribution of Fisher Effort at Lake Alaotra, Madagascar

Overview of attention for article published in Human Ecology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Drivers of the Distribution of Fisher Effort at Lake Alaotra, Madagascar
Published in
Human Ecology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10745-016-9805-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea P. C. Wallace, Julia P. G. Jones, E. J. Milner-Gulland, Graham E. Wallace, Richard Young, Emily Nicholson

Abstract

Understanding how fishers make decisions is important for improving management of fisheries. There is debate about the extent to which small-scale fishers follow an ideal free distribution (IFD) - distributing their fishing effort efficiently according to resource availability rather than being influenced by social factors or personal preference. Using detailed data from 1800 fisher catches and from semi-structured interviews with over 700 fishers at Lake Alaotra, the largest inland fishery in Madagascar, we show that fishers generally conform to IFD. However, there were differences in catch: effort relationships between fishers using different gear types as well as other revealing deviations from the predictions of IFD. Fishers report routine as the primary determinant of their choice of fishing location, explaining why they do not quickly respond to changes in catch at a site. Understanding the influences on fishers' spatial behaviour will allow better estimates of costs of fishing policies on resource users, and help predict their likely responses. This can inform management strategies to minimise the negative impacts of interventions, increasing local support for and compliance with rules.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Other 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 15 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 19 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,631,082
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#566
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,763
of 403,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.