↓ Skip to main content

Nrf2 Weaves an Elaborate Network of Neuroprotection Against Stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Nrf2 Weaves an Elaborate Network of Neuroprotection Against Stroke
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12035-016-9707-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuai Jiang, Chao Deng, Jianjun Lv, Chongxi Fan, Wei Hu, Shouyin Di, Xiaolong Yan, Zhiqiang Ma, Zhenxing Liang, Yang Yang

Abstract

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is a neuroprotective transcription factor that has recently attracted increased attention. Stroke, a common and serious neurological disease, is currently a leading cause of death in the USA so far. It is therefore of vital importance to explore how Nrf2 behaves in stroke. In this review, we first introduce the structural features of Nrf2 and Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and briefly depict the activation, inactivation, and regulation processes of the Nrf2 pathway. Next, we discuss the physiopathological mechanisms, upstream modulators, and downstream targets of the Nrf2 pathway. Following this background, we expand our discussion to the roles of Nrf2 in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and provide several potential future directions. The information presented here may be useful in the design of future experimental research and increase the likelihood of using Nrf2 as a therapeutic target for stroke in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 16 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,612,261
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,085
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,034
of 397,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#59
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.