↓ Skip to main content

Books: A Realist Theory of Science: A Philosophy of Science in Tune With the Complexities of General Practice

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1183 Mendeley
Title
Books: A Realist Theory of Science: A Philosophy of Science in Tune With the Complexities of General Practice
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, October 2018
DOI 10.3399/bjgp18x699665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alistair Appleby

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1183 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 <1%
Unknown 1182 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,996,379
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,706
of 4,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,360
of 350,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#93
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.