↓ Skip to main content

Cell-Free DNA as a Diagnostic Tool for Human Parasitic Infections

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Parasitology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell-Free DNA as a Diagnostic Tool for Human Parasitic Infections
Published in
Trends in Parasitology, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.pt.2016.01.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kosala G. Weerakoon, Donald P. McManus

Abstract

Parasites often cause devastating diseases and represent a significant public health and economic burden. More accurate and convenient diagnostic tools are needed in support of parasite control programmes in endemic regions, and for rapid point-of-care diagnosis in nonendemic areas. The detection of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a relatively new concept that is being applied in the current armamentarium of diagnostics. Here, we review the application of cfDNA detection with nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis and evaluation of different human parasitic infections and highlight the significant benefits of the approach using non-invasive clinical samples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Other 8 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 7%
Engineering 7 4%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,140,637
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Parasitology
#773
of 2,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,862
of 406,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Parasitology
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.