↓ Skip to main content

Establishment of wildflower fields in poor quality landscapes enhances micro-parasite prevalence in wild bumble bees

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Establishment of wildflower fields in poor quality landscapes enhances micro-parasite prevalence in wild bumble bees
Published in
Oecologia, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00442-018-4296-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels Piot, Ivan Meeus, David Kleijn, Jeroen Scheper, Theo Linders, Guy Smagghe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 24 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 47%
Environmental Science 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,284,169
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#2,946
of 4,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,664
of 359,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#32
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.