↓ Skip to main content

Differing views: Can chimpanzees do Level 2 perspective-taking?

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Differing views: Can chimpanzees do Level 2 perspective-taking?
Published in
Animal Cognition, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10071-016-0956-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katja Karg, Martin Schmelz, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello

Abstract

Although chimpanzees understand what others may see, it is unclear whether they understand how others see things (Level 2 perspective-taking). We investigated whether chimpanzees can predict the behavior of a conspecific which is holding a mistaken perspective that differs from their own. The subject competed with a conspecific over two food sticks. While the subject could see that both were the same size, to the competitor one appeared bigger than the other. In a previously established game, the competitor chose one stick in private first and the subject chose thereafter, without knowing which of the sticks was gone. Chimpanzees and 6-year-old children chose the 'riskier' stick (that looked bigger to the competitor) significantly less in the game than in a nonsocial control. Children chose randomly in the control, thus showing Level 2 perspective-taking skills; in contrast, chimpanzees had a preference for the 'riskier' stick here, rendering it possible that they attributed their own preference to the competitor to predict her choice. We thus run a follow-up in which chimpanzees did not have a preference in the control. Now, they also chose randomly in the game. We conclude that chimpanzees solved the task by attributing their own preference to the other, while children truly understood the other's mistaken perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 21%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,228,325
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#591
of 1,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,231
of 409,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.