↓ Skip to main content

A constrained edit distance between unordered labeled trees

Overview of attention for article published in Algorithmica, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
135 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
A constrained edit distance between unordered labeled trees
Published in
Algorithmica, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01975866
Authors

Kaizhong Zhang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
France 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Czechia 1 3%
Unknown 29 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 47%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 20 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Engineering 3 8%
Mathematics 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Algorithmica
#79
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,206
of 26,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Algorithmica
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.