↓ Skip to main content

How fitting is F.I.T.T.?: A perspective on a transition from the sole use of frequency, intensity, time, and type in exercise prescription

Overview of attention for article published in Physiology & Behavior, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How fitting is F.I.T.T.?: A perspective on a transition from the sole use of frequency, intensity, time, and type in exercise prescription
Published in
Physiology & Behavior, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn Burnet, Elizabeth Kelsch, Gabriel Zieff, Justin B Moore, Lee Stoner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 129 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Researcher 8 6%
Lecturer 6 5%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 49 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 26 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Psychology 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 56 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,735,044
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Physiology & Behavior
#1,083
of 5,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,052
of 365,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physiology & Behavior
#24
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,560 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.