You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Long term follow-up of deep brain stimulation of the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, December 2011
|
DOI | 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300765 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anders Fytagoridis, Ulrika Sandvik, Mattias Åström, Tommy Bergenheim, Patric Blomstedt |
Abstract |
The ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus is the standard target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in essential tremor (ET). However, favourable data have recently highlighted the caudal zona incerta (cZi) as an alternative target. Reports concerning the long-term results are however lacking, and we have therefore evaluated the long-term effects in our patients with ET and cZi DBS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
China | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 12% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 38% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 18% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,215,535
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#3,216
of 7,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,157
of 249,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.