↓ Skip to main content

Long term follow-up of deep brain stimulation of the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long term follow-up of deep brain stimulation of the caudal zona incerta for essential tremor
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, December 2011
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2011-300765
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Fytagoridis, Ulrika Sandvik, Mattias Åström, Tommy Bergenheim, Patric Blomstedt

Abstract

The ventral intermediate nucleus of thalamus is the standard target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in essential tremor (ET). However, favourable data have recently highlighted the caudal zona incerta (cZi) as an alternative target. Reports concerning the long-term results are however lacking, and we have therefore evaluated the long-term effects in our patients with ET and cZi DBS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
China 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Neuroscience 11 18%
Engineering 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2022.
All research outputs
#7,215,535
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#3,216
of 7,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,157
of 249,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,407 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.