| Title |
MiR-495 regulates proliferation and migration in NSCLC by targeting MTA3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tumor Biology, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13277-013-1460-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heying Chu, Xudong Chen, Huaqi Wang, Yuwen Du, Yuanyuan Wang, Wenqiao Zang, Ping Li, Juan Li, Jingxia Chang, Guoqiang Zhao, Guojun Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#7,472,296
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#412
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,469
of 307,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.