You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of attraction, entrance and passage of downstream migrant American eels (Anguilla rostrata) through airlift and siphon deep entrance bypass systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Engineering, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.10.011 |
| Authors |
Nicola Baker, Alex Haro, Barnaby Watten, John Noreika, Jonathan D. Bolland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 79% |
| Scientists | 6 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 9 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 18% |
| Engineering | 6 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,052,495
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Engineering
#72
of 1,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,463
of 446,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Engineering
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,571 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.