↓ Skip to main content

Can-SINE dynamics in the giant panda and three other Caniformia genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Mobile DNA, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Can-SINE dynamics in the giant panda and three other Caniformia genomes
Published in
Mobile DNA, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13100-018-0137-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changjun Peng, Lili Niu, Jiabo Deng, Jianqiu Yu, Xueyan Zhang, Chuang Zhou, Jinchuan Xing, Jing Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,858,021
of 23,767,404 outputs
Outputs from Mobile DNA
#270
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,312
of 348,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mobile DNA
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,767,404 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.