↓ Skip to main content

BRAF and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary cutaneous melanoma: a role for Snail and E-cadherin?

Overview of attention for article published in Human Pathology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BRAF and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in primary cutaneous melanoma: a role for Snail and E-cadherin?
Published in
Human Pathology, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.humpath.2015.12.030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendon Mitchell, Dominick A. Leone, John K. Feller, Shi Yang, Meera Mahalingam

Abstract

In vitro studies in melanoma indicate that upregulation of the transcriptional repressor Snail occurs with a concomitant decrease of its target E-cadherin, both hallmarks of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) - an association not established in vivo. We sought to elucidate the relationship between BRAF, Snail, E-cadherin and established histopathologic prognosticators in primary cutaneous melanoma (PCM). Archived annotated samples with a diagnosis of PCM were retrieved (n=68 cases; 34 BRAF mutant and 34 BRAFWT) and immunohistochemically stained for Snail and E-cadherin protein expression. A semi-quantitative scoring system was utilized. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to control confounders of BRAF. Snail expression was significantly associated only with ulceration (42% vs. 13%, p=0.02). E-cadherin expression was present in 26% of BRAF mutant and 71% of BRAFWT cases (p=0.0003). Loss of E-cadherin expression was associated with female gender (60% vs. 34% p=0.05), BRAF mutation (74% vs. 29%, p=0.0003), thickness ≥1mm (68% vs. 32%, p=0.004), mitosis (63% vs. 25%, p=0.007), and ulceration (75% vs. 44%, p=0.05). BRAF mutation was associated with male gender (60% vs. 30%, p=0.02), Breslow thickness (p=0.007), thickness ≥1mm (68% vs. 29%, p=0.002), and ulceration (75% vs. 42% p=0.02). Snail expression did not correlate with loss of E-cadherin expression (47% vs. 53%, p=0.79). After controlling for potential confounding, BRAF mutation was associated with loss of E-cadherin (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 8.332, 95%CI: 2.257-30.757, p=0.0015) and Breslow thickness >1 mm (Adjusted Odds Ratio = 7.360, 95%CI: 1.534-35.318, p=0.0126). Our findings, indicating that mutant BRAF represses E-cadherin expression, implicate a catalytic role for BRAF in EMT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 30%
Other 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 15%
Social Sciences 2 10%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,332,855
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Pathology
#871
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,681
of 406,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Pathology
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.