↓ Skip to main content

Strigolactones: new plant hormones in action

Overview of attention for article published in Planta, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
218 Mendeley
Title
Strigolactones: new plant hormones in action
Published in
Planta, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00425-015-2455-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Binne Zwanenburg, Tomáš Pospíšil, Sanja Ćavar Zeljković

Abstract

The key step in the mode of action of strigolactones is the enzymatic detachment of the D-ring. The thus formed hydroxy butenolide induces conformational changes of the receptor pocket which trigger a cascade of reactions in the signal transduction. Strigolactones (SLs) constitute a new class of plant hormones which are of increasing importance in plant science. For the last 60 years, they have been known as germination stimulants for parasitic plants. Recently, several new bio-properties of SLs have been discovered such as the branching factor for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, regulation of plant architecture (inhibition of bud outgrowth and of shoot branching) and the response to abiotic factors, etc. To broaden horizons and encourage new ideas for identifying and synthesising new and structurally simple SLs, this review is focused on molecular aspects of this new class of plant hormones. Special attention has been given to structural features, the mode of action of these phytohormones in various biological actions, the design of SL analogs and their applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 215 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Master 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 15%
Chemistry 17 8%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Engineering 2 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 50 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,769,480
of 22,844,985 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#87
of 2,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,998
of 397,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#3
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,844,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.