↓ Skip to main content

Reforming the Swedish pharmaceuticals market: consequences for costs per defined daily dose

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Economics and Management, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 104)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Reforming the Swedish pharmaceuticals market: consequences for costs per defined daily dose
Published in
International Journal of Health Economics and Management, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10754-016-9186-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mats A. Bergman, David Granlund, Niklas Rudholm

Abstract

In 2009 and 2010, the Swedish pharmaceuticals market was reformed. One of the stated policy goals was to achieve low costs for pharmaceutical products dispensed in Sweden. We use price and sales data for off-patent brand-name and generic pharmaceuticals to estimate a log-linear regression model, allowing us to assess how the policy changes affected the cost per defined daily dose. The estimated effect is an 18 % cost reduction per defined daily dose at the retail level and a 34 % reduction in the prices at the wholesale level (pharmacies' purchase prices). The empirical results suggest that the cost reductions were caused by the introduction of a price cap, an obligation to dispense the lowest-cost generic substitute available in the whole Swedish market, and the introduction of well-defined exchange groups. The reforms thus reduced the cost per defined daily dose for consumers while being advantageous also for the pharmacies, who saw their retail margins increase. However, pharmaceutical firms supplying off-patent pharmaceuticals experienced a clear reduction in the price received for their products.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 11 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2020.
All research outputs
#7,382,401
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#41
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,623
of 405,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Economics and Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them