↓ Skip to main content

Painlevé equations from Nakajima–Yoshioka blowup relations

Overview of attention for article published in Letters in Mathematical Physics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Painlevé equations from Nakajima–Yoshioka blowup relations
Published in
Letters in Mathematical Physics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11005-019-01198-4
Authors

M. Bershtein, A. Shchechkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 25%
Physics and Astronomy 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#12,916,999
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Letters in Mathematical Physics
#142
of 805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,309
of 344,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Letters in Mathematical Physics
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.