| Title |
Responsibility for Reason-Giving: The Case of Individual Tainted Reasoning in Systemic Corruption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10677-018-9950-2 |
| Authors |
Emanuela Ceva, Lubomira Radoilska |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 15% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#18,699,725
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#456
of 624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,245
of 353,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ethical Theory and Moral Practice
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.