You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Truncating Erythropoietin Receptor Rearrangements in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Cell, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.12.013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilaria Iacobucci, Yongjin Li, Kathryn G. Roberts, Stephanie M. Dobson, Jaeseung C. Kim, Debbie Payne-Turner, Richard C. Harvey, Marcus Valentine, Kelly McCastlain, John Easton, Donald Yergeau, Laura J. Janke, Ying Shao, I-Ming L. Chen, Michael Rusch, Sasan Zandi, Steven M. Kornblau, Marina Konopleva, Elias Jabbour, Elisabeth M. Paietta, Jacob M. Rowe, Ching-Hon Pui, Julie Gastier-Foster, Zhaohui Gu, Shalini Reshmi, Mignon L. Loh, Janis Racevskis, Martin S. Tallman, Peter H. Wiernik, Mark R. Litzow, Cheryl L. Willman, John D. McPherson, James R. Downing, Jinghui Zhang, John E. Dick, Stephen P. Hunger, Charles G. Mullighan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 30% |
| India | 2 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 4% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
| Algeria | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 25% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 210. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#188,343
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell
#75
of 3,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,244
of 411,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.