↓ Skip to main content

Solo versus joint bimanual coordination

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Solo versus joint bimanual coordination
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00221-018-5420-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Dixon, Scott Glover

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 23%
Engineering 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,994,004
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,117
of 3,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,871
of 357,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.