↓ Skip to main content

Urban Stormwater Governance: The Need for a Paradigm Shift

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Urban Stormwater Governance: The Need for a Paradigm Shift
Published in
Environmental Management, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00267-016-0667-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishna P. Dhakal, Lizette R. Chevalier

Abstract

Traditional urban stormwater management involves rapid removal of stormwater through centralized conveyance systems of curb-gutter-pipe networks. This results in many adverse impacts on the environment including hydrological disruption, groundwater depletion, downstream flooding, receiving water quality degradation, channel erosion, and stream ecosystem damage. In order to mitigate these adverse impacts, urban stormwater managers are increasingly using green infrastructure that promote on-site infiltration, restore hydrological functions of the landscape, and reduce surface runoff. Existing stormwater governance, however, is centralized and structured to support the conventional systems. This governance approach is not suited to the emerging distributed management approach, which involves multiple stakeholders including parcel owners, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations. This incongruence between technology and governance calls for a paradigm shift in the governance from centralized and technocratic to distributed and participatory governance. This paper evaluates how five US cities have been adjusting their governance to address the discord. Finally, the paper proposes an alternative governance model, which provides a mechanism to involve stakeholders and implement distributed green infrastructure under an integrative framework.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 273 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 22%
Student > Master 38 14%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 39 14%
Unknown 71 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 61 22%
Engineering 46 17%
Social Sciences 28 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 33 12%
Unknown 93 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,714,906
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#179
of 1,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,557
of 410,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.