| Title |
Limb blood flow and tissue perfusion during exercise with blood flow restriction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-018-4029-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew A. Kilgas, John McDaniel, Jon Stavres, Brandon S. Pollock, Tyler J. Singer, Steven J. Elmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 34 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,242,449
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#978
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,410
of 356,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.