| Title |
Identification and detection sensitivity of Microcystis aeruginosa from mixed and field samples using MALDI-TOF MS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10661-018-7093-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li-Wei Sun, Wen-Jing Jiang, Jun-Yi Zhang, Wen-Qian Wang, Yang Du, Hiroaki Sato, Masanobu Kawachi, Ran Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,924,437
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1,144
of 2,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,580
of 350,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,748 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.