You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bulk electronic transport impacts on electron transfer at conducting polymer electrode–electrolyte interfaces
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1806087115 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kosala Wijeratne, Ujwala Ail, Robert Brooke, Mikhail Vagin, Xianjie Liu, Mats Fahlman, Xavier Crispin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 19 | 17% |
| Engineering | 19 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 15 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Energy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,234,989
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#88,923
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,071
of 357,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#808
of 963 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 963 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.