↓ Skip to main content

Developing a scale to measure trust in health promotion partnerships

Overview of attention for article published in Health Promotion International, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a scale to measure trust in health promotion partnerships
Published in
Health Promotion International, February 2011
DOI 10.1093/heapro/dar007
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Jones, M. M. Barry

Abstract

Developing and sustaining partnerships for promoting health has been identified as an important strategy for addressing the health challenges that face society. Trust is one of the most important factors that help partnerships function effectively. In health promotion partnerships, trust is an under-researched and poorly understood phenomenon. This study was designed to identify how trust is conceptualized in health promotion partnerships and to develop a trust measurement tool. Five focus groups were organized with 36 health promotion partners in order to explore how trust is conceptualized in their partnerships. Participants represented health, community, education, arts, sports and youth sectors. A content analysis was carried out on the transcripts and a 14-item, five-point scale, was developed from the findings. This scale was incorporated into an overall questionnaire on partnership functioning which was posted to 469 partners in 40 health promotion partnerships. A response rate of 72% was achieved (n= 337) for the postal survey. The trust scale was subjected to reliability and validity tests. Principal Component Analysis yielded two components, named positive trust and mistrust, explaining 59% of the variance. Coefficients ranged from 0.845 to 0.511 with eigenvalues before rotation of 6.58 and 1.66. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91. Further research is required to establish whether the scale can be used with other types of partnerships.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 82 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Master 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Other 27 31%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Social Sciences 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 9%
Psychology 7 8%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2011.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Health Promotion International
#1,470
of 1,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,578
of 106,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Promotion International
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.