↓ Skip to main content

Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
Title
Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agustina Mazzoni, Fernando Althabe, Laura Gutierrez, Luz Gibbons, Nancy H. Liu, Ana María Bonotti, Gustavo H. Izbizky, Marta Ferrary, Nora Viergue, Silvia I. Vigil, Gabriela Zalazar Denett, José M. Belizán

Abstract

Rates of caesarean section have steadily increased in most middle- and high-income countries over the last few decades without medical justification. Maternal request is one of the frequently cited non-medical factors contributing to this trend. The objectives of this study were to assess pregnant women's preferences regarding mode of delivery and to compare actual caesarean section rates in the public and private sectors. A prospective cohort study was conducted in two public and three private hospitals in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 382 nulliparous pregnant women (183 from the private sector and 199 from the public sector) aged 18 to 35 years, with single pregnancies over 32 weeks of gestational age were enrolled during antenatal care visits between October 2010 and September 2011. We excluded women with pregnancies resulting from assisted fertility, women with known pre-existing major diseases or, with pregnancy complications, or with a medical indication of elective cesarean section. We used two different approaches to assess women's preferences: a survey using a tailored questionnaire, and a discrete choice experiment. Only 8 and 6 % of the healthy nulliparous women in the public and private sectors, respectively, expressed a preference for caesarean section. Fear of pain and safety were the most frequently expressed reasons for preferring caesarean section. When reasons for delivery mode were assessed by a discrete choice experiment, women placed the most emphasis on sex after childbirth. Of women who expressed their preference for vaginal delivery, 34 and 40 % ended their pregnancies by caesarean section in public and private hospitals, respectively. The preference for caesarean section is low among healthy nulliparous women in Buenos Aires. The reasons why these women had a rate of more than 35 % caesarean sections are unlikely related to their preferences for mode of delivery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 191 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Researcher 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 19%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 61 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,431,030
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,052
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,946
of 402,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#30
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.