↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing a single and four Sterile Water Injection Technique for the relief of back pain during labour

Overview of attention for article published in Women & Birth, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing a single and four Sterile Water Injection Technique for the relief of back pain during labour
Published in
Women & Birth, October 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.07.025
Authors

Nigel Lee, Sue Kildea, Peter Coxeter, Vanessa Wright, Michael Beckmann, Joan Webster, Patricia Smith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 355 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 <1%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 <1%
Student > Master 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Women & Birth
#1,265
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,711
of 143,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Women & Birth
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.