↓ Skip to main content

Food Variety as a Predictor of Nutritional Status Among Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
176 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
Title
Food Variety as a Predictor of Nutritional Status Among Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10803-011-1268-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle H. Zimmer, Laura C. Hart, Patricia Manning-Courtney, Donna S. Murray, Nicole M. Bing, Suzanne Summer

Abstract

The frequency of selective eating and nutritional deficiency was studied among 22 children with autism and an age matched typically developing control group. Children with autism ate fewer foods on average than typically developing children. (33.5 vs. 54.5 foods, P < .001) As compared to typical controls, children with autism had a higher average intake of magnesium, and lower average intake of protein, calcium, vitamin B12, and vitamin D. Selective eaters were significantly more likely than typical controls to be at risk for at least one serious nutrient deficiency (P < .001).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 280 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 19%
Student > Bachelor 44 15%
Researcher 20 7%
Other 18 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 82 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 16%
Psychology 25 9%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 92 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,491,959
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#613
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,121
of 112,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#7
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.