↓ Skip to main content

Identifying medical students at risk of underperformance from significant stressors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Identifying medical students at risk of underperformance from significant stressors
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0565-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim J. Wilkinson, Jan M. McKenzie, Anthony N. Ali, Joy Rudland, Frances A. Carter, Caroline J. Bell

Abstract

Stress is associated with poorer academic performance but identifying vulnerable students is less clear. A series of earthquakes and disrupted learning environments created an opportunity to explore the relationships among stress, student factors, support and academic performance within a medical course. The outcomes were deviations from expected performances on end of year written and clinical examinations. The predictors were questionnaire-based measures of connectedness/support, impact of the earthquakes, safety, depression, anxiety, stress, resilience and personality. The response rate was 77 %. Poorer than expected performance on all examinations was associated with greater disruptions to living arrangements and fewer years in the country; on the written examination with not having a place to study; and on the clinical examination with relationship status, not having the support of others, less extroversion, and feeling less safe. There was a suggestion of a beneficial association with some markers of stress. We show that academic performance is assisted by students having a secure physical and emotional base. The students who are most vulnerable are those with fewer social networks, and those who are recent immigrants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 175 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 11%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Other 52 30%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 38%
Psychology 18 10%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,758,104
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,194
of 3,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,893
of 406,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#49
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.