↓ Skip to main content

ベイズ推定による火山噴火の短期的な危険性評価:御嶽山2014年危機への遡及的適用

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem), January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ベイズ推定による火山噴火の短期的な危険性評価:御嶽山2014年危機への遡及的適用
Published in
Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem), January 2015
DOI 10.2208/jscejsp.71.i_105
Authors

池田 一, 吉田 真也, 安養寺 信夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,265,756
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem)
#3
of 15 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,026
of 359,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. F6 (Safety Problem)
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 109.0. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them