You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of hand proportions on tool grip abilities in humans, great apes and fossil hominins: A biomechanical analysis using musculoskeletal simulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Human Evolution, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.10.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ameline Bardo, Laurent Vigouroux, Tracy L. Kivell, Emmanuelle Pouydebat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 30% |
| France | 4 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Samoa | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 64% |
| Scientists | 15 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,160,024
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Evolution
#387
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,310
of 354,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Evolution
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.