↓ Skip to main content

Tin-based opacifiers in archaeological glass and ceramic glazes: a review and new perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Tin-based opacifiers in archaeological glass and ceramic glazes: a review and new perspectives
Published in
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12520-018-0735-2
Authors

Moujan Matin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 10 18%
Arts and Humanities 9 16%
Materials Science 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,867,545
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#579
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,841
of 346,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.