↓ Skip to main content

Deviation analysis for texture segmentation of breast lesions in mammographic images

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal Plus, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Deviation analysis for texture segmentation of breast lesions in mammographic images
Published in
The European Physical Journal Plus, November 2018
DOI 10.1140/epjp/i2018-12294-4
Authors

Bushra Mughal, Nazeer Muhammad, Muhammad Sharif

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 22%
Mathematics 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#5,834,644
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal Plus
#193
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,439
of 352,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal Plus
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.