You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating airsoft electric guns for control of invasive brown treesnakes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.909 |
| Authors |
Adam J. Knox, Björn Lardner, Amy Yackel Adams, Robert N. Reed |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 50% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 25% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,551,023
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#60
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,603
of 351,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.