Title |
Association between known or strongly suspected malignant hyperthermia susceptibility and postoperative outcomes: an observational population-based study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, November 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12630-018-1250-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philip M. Jones, Britney N. Allen, Richard A. Cherry, Luc Dubois, Kelly N. Vogt, Salimah Z. Shariff, Krista M. Bray Jenkyn, Sheila Riazi, Duminda N. Wijeysundera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 6 | 38% |
United States | 2 | 13% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 6% |
Argentina | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#3,591,401
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#567
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,553
of 357,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#19
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.