You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Natural climate solutions for the United States
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.aat1869 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph E. Fargione, Steven Bassett, Timothy Boucher, Scott D. Bridgham, Richard T. Conant, Susan C. Cook-Patton, Peter W. Ellis, Alessandra Falcucci, James W. Fourqurean, Trisha Gopalakrishna, Huan Gu, Benjamin Henderson, Matthew D. Hurteau, Kevin D. Kroeger, Timm Kroeger, Tyler J. Lark, Sara M. Leavitt, Guy Lomax, Robert I. McDonald, J. Patrick Megonigal, Daniela A. Miteva, Curtis J. Richardson, Jonathan Sanderman, David Shoch, Seth A. Spawn, Joseph W. Veldman, Christopher A. Williams, Peter B. Woodbury, Chris Zganjar, Marci Baranski, Patricia Elias, Richard A. Houghton, Emily Landis, Emily McGlynn, William H. Schlesinger, Juha V. Siikamaki, Ariana E. Sutton-Grier, Bronson W. Griscom |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 103 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 4% |
| Canada | 8 | 4% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 71 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 178 | 80% |
| Scientists | 34 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 770 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 770 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 158 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 122 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 92 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 47 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 127 | 16% |
| Unknown | 178 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 220 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 54 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 4% |
| Engineering | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 84 | 11% |
| Unknown | 243 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 915. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#19,060
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#279
of 12,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313
of 355,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#6
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.