| Title |
Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Caroline Oenning, Reinhilde Jacobs, Ruben Pauwels, Andreas Stratis, Mihaela Hedesiu, Benjamin Salmon, On behalf of the DIMITRA Research Group, http://www.dimitra.be |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 20% |
| Unknown | 61 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 45% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 69 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,009,134
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#506
of 2,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,905
of 340,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#14
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.