You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental degradation of helicoidal photonic nanostructures in scarab beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): implications for the identification of circularly polarizing cuticle in the fossil record
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rsif.2018.0560 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giliane P. Odin, Maria E. McNamara, Hans Arwin, Kenneth Järrendahl |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,210,761
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#853
of 3,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,028
of 350,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#12
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.