↓ Skip to main content

Non-standard ROS-generating combination “theraphthal–ascorbic acid” in low-temperature transformations of carbon allotropes

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical Papers, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Non-standard ROS-generating combination “theraphthal–ascorbic acid” in low-temperature transformations of carbon allotropes
Published in
Chemical Papers, August 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11696-018-0571-y
Authors

Oxana V. Kharissova, Jared Rodríguez, Boris I. Kharisov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 40%
Materials Science 1 20%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Chemical Papers
#142
of 246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,052
of 341,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical Papers
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.