| Title |
Identifying nurses' rewards: a qualitative categorization study in Belgium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-4-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara De Gieter, Rein De Cooman, Roland Pepermans, Ralf Caers, Cindy Du Bois, Marc Jegers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 23 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 10% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#1,002
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,870
of 89,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.