| Title |
Characterisation of the NRF2 transcriptional network and its response to chemical insult in primary human hepatocytes: implications for prediction of drug-induced liver injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-018-2354-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ian M. Copple, Wouter den Hollander, Giulia Callegaro, Fiona E. Mutter, James L. Maggs, Amy L. Schofield, Lucille Rainbow, Yongxiang Fang, Jeffrey J. Sutherland, Ewa C. Ellis, Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg, Stephen W. Fenwick, Christopher E. Goldring, Bob van de Water, James L. Stevens, B. Kevin Park |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,540,789
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,382
of 2,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,522
of 343,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#27
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.