↓ Skip to main content

Lessons from natural variations: artificially induced heading date variations for improvement of regional adaptation in rice

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Lessons from natural variations: artificially induced heading date variations for improvement of regional adaptation in rice
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, October 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00122-018-3225-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Hu, Shuangle Li, Yongzhong Xing

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,982,439
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,077
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,414
of 352,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#29
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.