You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A collaborative analysis of individual participant data from 19 prospective studies assesses circulating vitamin D and prostate cancer risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2318 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth C Travis, Aurora Perez-Cornago, Paul N Appleby, Demetrius Albanes, Corinne E Joshu, Pamela L Lutsey, Alison M Mondul, Elizabeth A Platz, Stephanie J Weinstein, Tracy M Layne, Kathy J Helzlsouer, Kala Visvanathan, Domenico Palli, Petra H Peeters, Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Antonia Trichopoulou, Marc J Gunter, Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Maria-Jose Sánchez, Anja Olsen, Hermann Brenner, Ben Schöttker, Laura Perna, Bernd Holleczek, Paul Knekt, Harri Rissanen, Bu B Yeap, Leon Flicker, Osvaldo P Almeida, Yuen Yee Elizabeth Wong, June M Chan, Edward L Giovannucci, Meir J Stampfer, Giske Ursin, Randi E Gislefoss, Tone Bjørge, Haakon E Meyer, Rune Blomhoff, Shoichiro Tsugane, Norie Sawada, Dallas R English, Darryl W Eyles, Alicia K Heath, Elizabeth J Williamson, Jonas Manjer, Johan Malm, Martin Almquist, Loic Le Marchand, Christopher A Haiman, Lynne R Wilkens, Jeannette M Schenk, Cathy M Tangen, Amanda Black, Michael B Cook, Wen-Yi Huang, Regina G Ziegler, Richard M Martin, Freddie C Hamdy, Jenny L Donovan, David E Neal, Mathilde Touvier, Serge Hercberg, Pilar Galan, Mélanie Deschasaux, Timothy J Key, Naomi E Allen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 39% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Turkey | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 34 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,137,283
of 24,059,832 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Research
#763
of 18,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,552
of 445,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Research
#11
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,059,832 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.