↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the dependence of urban pollinators on ornamental, non-native, and ‘weedy’ floral resources

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Ecosystems, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the dependence of urban pollinators on ornamental, non-native, and ‘weedy’ floral resources
Published in
Urban Ecosystems, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11252-018-0817-z
Authors

David M. Lowenstein, Kevin C. Matteson, Emily S. Minor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Professor 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 38%
Environmental Science 39 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 44 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,521,195
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#347
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,400
of 347,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.