| Title |
A New Guiding Framework for Engaging Diverse Populations in Disaster Risk Reduction: Reach, Relevance, Receptiveness, and Relationships
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13753-018-0193-6 |
| Authors |
Jay Marlowe, Andreas Neef, Chelsea R. Tevaga, Cedric Tevaga |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 2 | 50% |
| Zambia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 22% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 29 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,525,216
of 23,666,107 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#38
of 247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,092
of 344,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 247 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.