↓ Skip to main content

Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Melanin Biosynthetic Enzymes by cAMP and Resveratrol in Human Melanocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Dermatology, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Post-Transcriptional Regulation of Melanin Biosynthetic Enzymes by cAMP and Resveratrol in Human Melanocytes
Published in
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, April 2007
DOI 10.1038/sj.jid.5700840
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard A. Newton, Anthony L. Cook, Donald W. Roberts, J. Helen Leonard, Richard A. Sturm

Abstract

Upregulation of microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) expression has been proposed to mediate melanogenesis stimulated by cAMP, whereas downregulation of MITF has been suggested to underlie the depigmentary effects of resveratrol, a promising chemotherapeutic found in red wine. We have assessed the contribution of MITF to pigmentation regulation by treating primary cultures of normal human melanocytes with the adenylate cyclase activator forskolin and/or resveratrol, then quantifying mRNA and protein levels for MITF, tyrosinase, tyrosinase-related protein-1, and dopachrome tautomerase (DCT). The inhibition of tyrosinase activity by resveratrol was not due to alterations in MITF, but instead was explained by both direct tyrosinase inhibition and a post-transcriptional effect that reduced the amount of fully processed tyrosinase. Glycosidase digestion revealed that the basis for the tyrosinase decrease was the retention of an immature form in the ER and subsequent loss of the mature, Golgi-processed enzyme. Elevation of intracellular cAMP by forskolin markedly increased protein levels for MITF, tyrosinase and DCT, however there was no concomitant increase in tyrosinase or DCT mRNA. This indicated that elevated levels of MITF were not sufficient to promote transcription of these melanogenic genes and that the increase in their protein abundance appeared to be predominantly mediated through post-transcriptional processing events.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Master 8 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 13%
Chemistry 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2007.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#7,395
of 8,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,009
of 86,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Dermatology
#51
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.