↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between pure MPI and hybrid MPI-OpenMP parallelism for Discrete Element Method (DEM) of ellipsoidal and poly-ellipsoidal particles

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Particle Mechanics, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Comparison between pure MPI and hybrid MPI-OpenMP parallelism for Discrete Element Method (DEM) of ellipsoidal and poly-ellipsoidal particles
Published in
Computational Particle Mechanics, November 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40571-018-0213-8
Authors

Beichuan Yan, Richard A. Regueiro

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 29%
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 7 41%
Computer Science 3 18%
Materials Science 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#20,540,789
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from Computational Particle Mechanics
#180
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,484
of 343,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Particle Mechanics
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.